It is my educated opinion (over one year of study of this case) that Rudy Guede alone murdered Meredith Kercher then molested her body at about 9 pm, Nov 1, 2007. Amanda Knox and her boyfriend Raffaele Sollecito had nothing to do with this crime. Raffaele’s computer records provide an alibi for him and Knox until 9:26 pm, Nov 1, 2007. Guede is a known drug dealer, burglar, and known to threaten with a knife. His DNA was found on the victim's clothing and in her body. His DNA, hand print, and shoe prints were found at the crime scene. His bloody shoe prints lead from the victim's body to the apartment exit door. No credible evidence places Knox or Sollecito at the crime scene. Guede said he was on the toilet taking a dump and listening to music when Meredith was murdered.
Rudy Guede consistently told the police investigators and the court that he was at Meredith's apartment waiting for her to come home. A window at the apartment was found busted, and the windows found open, which provided him entry. He was captured on CCTV cam arriving at her apartment two times shortly before Meredith’s image was captured on CCTV cam arriving at her driveway at 8:51 pm. Her time of death depends on how long Guede let her live after she entered her apartment.
Judge Massei's motivation report says Guede's whereabouts is not known, so he assumes Guede arrived with Amanda and Raffaele at 11 pm.
Meredith’s stomach contents indicated she was murdered no later than, first, 9 pm in Judge Micheli’s report and then later, 10 or 11 pm in the same revised reports. However, Massei has Meredith being murdered at 11:30 pm which is not supported by science.
Recently an independent lab released their conclusions about the so called murder weapon, and the bra clasp said to have Raffaele's DNA on it:
How was it possible for Amanda to murder her with a knife that has obviously NEVER had blood on it, do it in a small room with Guede and not leave a trace of herself or carry any evidence away from the crime scene on her clothes or body? It is not possible. This does not happen in the real world.
Recently eleven high ranking members of the Italian government called for an investigation of the prosecutor and the authorities involved with railroading Amanda and Raffaele.
Rudy Guede consistently told the police investigators and the court that he was at Meredith's apartment waiting for her to come home. A window at the apartment was found busted, and the windows found open, which provided him entry. He was captured on CCTV cam arriving at her apartment two times shortly before Meredith’s image was captured on CCTV cam arriving at her driveway at 8:51 pm. Her time of death depends on how long Guede let her live after she entered her apartment.
Judge Massei's motivation report says Guede's whereabouts is not known, so he assumes Guede arrived with Amanda and Raffaele at 11 pm.
Meredith’s stomach contents indicated she was murdered no later than, first, 9 pm in Judge Micheli’s report and then later, 10 or 11 pm in the same revised reports. However, Massei has Meredith being murdered at 11:30 pm which is not supported by science.
Recently an independent lab released their conclusions about the so called murder weapon, and the bra clasp said to have Raffaele's DNA on it:
How was it possible for Amanda to murder her with a knife that has obviously NEVER had blood on it, do it in a small room with Guede and not leave a trace of herself or carry any evidence away from the crime scene on her clothes or body? It is not possible. This does not happen in the real world.
Recently eleven high ranking members of the Italian government called for an investigation of the prosecutor and the authorities involved with railroading Amanda and Raffaele.
ITEM 36 (KNIFE)
Relative to the genetic analysis performed on trace A (handle of the knife), we agree with the conclusion reached by the Technical Consultant regarding the attribution of the genetic profile obtained from these samples to Amanda Marie Knox.
Relative to trace B (blade of the knife) we find tanalysistechnical analyses performed are not reliable for the following reasons:
1. There does not exist evidence which scientifically confirms that trace B (blade of knife) is the product of blood.
2. The electrophoretic profiles exhibited reveal that the sample indicated by the letter B (blade of knife) was a Low Copy Number (LCN) sample, and, as such, all of the precautions indicated by the international scientific community should have been applied.
3. Taking into account that none of the recommendations of the international scientific community relative to the treatment of Low Copy Number (LCN) samples were followed, we do not accept the conclusions regarding the certain attribution of the profile found on trace B (blade of knife) to the victim Meredith Susanna Cara Kercher, since the genetic profile, as obtained, appears unreliable insofar as it is not supported by scientifically validated analysis;
4. International protocols of inspection, collection, and sampling were not followed;
5. It cannot be ruled out that the result obtained from sample B (blade of knife) derives from contamination in some phase of the collection and/oanalysisng and/or analyses performed.
ITEM 165B (BRA CLASPS)
Relative to Item 165B (bra clasps), we find that the technical analysis is not reliable for the following reasons:
1. There does not exist evidence which scientifically confirms the presence of supposed flaking cells on the item;
2. There was an erroneous interpretation of the electrophoretic profile of the autosomic STRs;
3. There was an erroneous interpretation of the electrophoretic profile relative to the Y chromosome;
4. The international protocols for inspection, collection, and sampling of the item were not followed;
5. It cannot be ruled out that the results obtained derive from environmental contamination and/or contamination in some phase of the collection and/or handling of the item.
THE EXPERTS
Prof. Carla Vecchiotti
Prof. Stefano Conti
Relative to the genetic analysis performed on trace A (handle of the knife), we agree with the conclusion reached by the Technical Consultant regarding the attribution of the genetic profile obtained from these samples to Amanda Marie Knox.
Relative to trace B (blade of the knife) we find tanalysistechnical analyses performed are not reliable for the following reasons:
1. There does not exist evidence which scientifically confirms that trace B (blade of knife) is the product of blood.
2. The electrophoretic profiles exhibited reveal that the sample indicated by the letter B (blade of knife) was a Low Copy Number (LCN) sample, and, as such, all of the precautions indicated by the international scientific community should have been applied.
3. Taking into account that none of the recommendations of the international scientific community relative to the treatment of Low Copy Number (LCN) samples were followed, we do not accept the conclusions regarding the certain attribution of the profile found on trace B (blade of knife) to the victim Meredith Susanna Cara Kercher, since the genetic profile, as obtained, appears unreliable insofar as it is not supported by scientifically validated analysis;
4. International protocols of inspection, collection, and sampling were not followed;
5. It cannot be ruled out that the result obtained from sample B (blade of knife) derives from contamination in some phase of the collection and/oanalysisng and/or analyses performed.
ITEM 165B (BRA CLASPS)
Relative to Item 165B (bra clasps), we find that the technical analysis is not reliable for the following reasons:
1. There does not exist evidence which scientifically confirms the presence of supposed flaking cells on the item;
2. There was an erroneous interpretation of the electrophoretic profile of the autosomic STRs;
3. There was an erroneous interpretation of the electrophoretic profile relative to the Y chromosome;
4. The international protocols for inspection, collection, and sampling of the item were not followed;
5. It cannot be ruled out that the results obtained derive from environmental contamination and/or contamination in some phase of the collection and/or handling of the item.
THE EXPERTS
Prof. Carla Vecchiotti
Prof. Stefano Conti
